I’ve realized SegWit, Taproot, Schnoor and Ordinals not too long ago. I can perceive all these phrases. However I do not perceive why folks say Taproot makes Ordinals potential.
Taproot is definitely the model 1 of SegWit. Earlier than Taproot, we will solely set model 0 when utilizing SetWit. However I believe the model 0 SegWit is already adequate to implement Ordinals protocol? In the identical method, we’d like 2 phases/transactions to inscribe some information:
- Create a P2WSH transaction to commit a script. Identical to what Ordinals does now (i.e., create a P2TR transaction to commit a script).
- Create a transaction to disclose the script within the
witness
subject. Identical to what Ordinals does now.
Within the script, I can nonetheless use the OP_FALSE OP_IF ... OP_ENDIF
sample to embed the inscription information into the script.
So we will nonetheless implement Ordinals protocol with out Taproot. Why do folks say Taproot makes Ordinals potential?
Leave a Reply