multi signature – Evaluation of multisig funds safety technique – CoinNewsTrend

multi signature – Evaluation of multisig funds safety technique


I need to shield my bitcoin and my risk mannequin is that one of many two paper copies of the seed is accessed to get well the pockets and steal the funds. To mitigate this threat I’m considering the choices of a 2-out-3 multi-sig pockets. My first technique is as follows:
enter image description here

I’ve subsequently 4 geographically separate and secret areas (excluding myself). By way of {hardware} wallets with me, I solely have 1 which suggests if the principle gadget is stolen, my bitcoins are secure as another key’s wanted. The identical is true if areas 1 or 2 are uncovered and a {hardware} pockets units had been to be stolen (as only one {hardware} pockets is there). Nonetheless, taking the seed perspective, two seeds can be compromised.

My first query is whether or not an attacker can steal the funds with the 2 seeds uncovered or if 3 seeds are a should in an effort to recreate the pockets and take the funds? (I’m assuming that if the attacker would have entry to the two seeds to recreate non-public keys and the multisig pockets that was arrange on my private pc will not be attainable). I believe that’s the case, as a result of recovering multisig pockets on Electrum requires 3 seeds (or 1 seed and a couple of public keys of the co-signers), however wished to double-check with the group that certainly no bitcoin might be moved with simply two seeds uncovered. Observe that with this setup it’s successfully cold-cold storage as shifting bitcoin, on this case, requires going to both location 1 or 2 to take both {hardware} pockets 1 or 2 to co-sign with the {hardware} pockets 3.

The opposite possibility is to create a hidden pockets with a passphrase utilizing only one pockets. In that case 2 copies of seed and a couple of copies of the passphrase might be saved in 4 geographically distinct areas. If the seed is uncovered then the hidden pockets cannot be accessed and if the passphrase is accessed then the hidden pockets cannot be recreated too. The one vulnerability within the latter case is that if the {hardware} gadget was stolen and used to maneuver the cash (both by tampering with it bodily or by immediately utilizing it though utilization might be restricted with the gadget PIN).

My second query is whether or not the primary possibility provides a considerably greater entropy for the safety. Observe that by way of prices of storage the fee can be the identical as in each instances we should make use of 4 areas.



Supply hyperlink