bitcoin core – previous paper pockets reveals lacking stability after import; hacked? Bug? Confused?

I’ve an previous (2014) paper pockets I’ve deposited cash into through the years. I’ve one other paper pockets that was generated across the similar time, however wasn’t used till final yr. I simply completed syncing Bitcoin Core and imported the keys from the paper pockets, first the older key with out rescan, then the newer key with rescan.

After a rescan, I am not seeing the anticipated stability.

I have been monitoring the previous pockets with the Samourai Sentinel app. This app reveals a stability of 8 BTC on the tackle. When clicking by means of, the app takes me to: 1PMoUJpj73FUTbjMiKwJfJoo4fJaUE9bTr. This seems about proper, and like what I count on. (for some motive, the hyperlink does not work direct, however navigating to http://srv1.yogh.io and coming into the tackle brings it up; cookie associated most likely)

However in Bitcoin Core, I do not see the stability. I do see the stability for the newer pockets, which has 2 BTC in it right here: 1LwpoTZwuS8Yw5T9EdnnHemmqQ46jCUznK.

$ bitcoin-cli listreceivedbyaddress
[
  
    "address": "14H7dShaq6CGtyZQujckNSswac7tM5CMjE",
    "amount": 7.00850502,
    "confirmations": 388012,
    "label": "",
    "txids": [
      "d7896aa4f8bc3cb40c7abc5e388f9f505b607a57b73a0ab6594355eb6977155e",
      "ecc0149be32a31f721ed722b6788773796c627bfc6edab6dcd6242a4cd0f2a5e",
      "8a0ac886cff7af925be4df890e0fddc44929bd781716661c1706536c92d74789"
    ]
  ,
  
    "tackle": "1LwpoTZwuS8Yw5T9EdnnHemmqQ46jCUznK",
    "quantity": 1.99645000,
    "confirmations": 33899,
    "label": "",
    "txids": [
      "783042888dc68a52379f4905260ee3e457524ce7a1738d0d1dbdf2f5a7e84016",
      "14e16a88bab62f5a40580635ed4476e0859ecf36f943488afb15f838f2c307d4"
    ]
  
]

The second tackle matches my newer paper pockets, however the first tackle does not match the older pockets, and it seems prefer it’s been fully spent. These transactions predate these I count on and see in 1PMoUJpj73FUTbjMiKwJfJoo4fJaUE9bTr, so it is potential this was a key re-used by mistake, however my reminiscence does not go that far again.

Can somebody clarify what is going on on? Did I mess up someplace?